Example output for a fictional student. Your real review uses your own resume and the JD you paste.
JPMorgan parses every analyst application through Workday with the same strictness as Goldman. The 2026 IB analyst class is targeting 2,800 hires globally against ~200,000 applications, putting the keyword bar high. A passing JPM resume hits 75+ ATS, leads bullets with the deal type and a quantified outcome, and surfaces sector coverage relevant to the group you applied to (TMT, healthcare, consumer, FIG). The widget below scores yours against the JPM JD in 30 seconds.
JPMorgan runs every IB Analyst application through Workday, which scores resumes against the JD for keyword match, format, and section structure before a single human reads them. A bullet that reads fine to a friend can score in the 40s against the actual JD because Workday matches exact phrases, models, and quantified outcomes the investment banking analyst posting expects. Don't let the bot cut you before the recruiter ever opens the file. The widget above runs that scoring on your PDF against the JPMorgan JD you paste, in 30 seconds.
JPMORGAN IB ANALYST RESUMES, BY THE NUMBERS
~71x
oversubscription ratio for the 2026 JPM IB analyst class (200K apps for 2,800 seats)
Workday
JPM's ATS, same parser strictness as Goldman
30 sec
what the widget above takes to score your resume against the JD
The flags that drive the score and the rewrites for a JPMorgan investment banking analyst application. Calibrated to what Workday matches against and what a JPMorgan recruiter looks for in the human pass that follows.
Sector coverage signal
JPM analyst JDs name the coverage group (TMT, healthcare, FIG, consumer, industrials). Bullets that surface relevant sector exposure score higher.
JPM modeling language
Same model set as Goldman (LBO, DCF, accretion/dilution) but JPM JDs more often call out "trading comps" and "precedent transactions" by name.
Athletic Greens, Apollo, Endeavor
JPM-led 2024-2025 deals frequently named in recent JDs as "complex situations" examples. Referencing one in your bullets shows you have studied the deal pipeline.
Workday formatting rules
Single column, no tables, standard fonts, MM/YYYY dates, contact info in body not header. ~41% Workday parse failure on two-column resumes.
Section ordering
Education first. GPA visible. Recent JPM JDs flag "minimum 3.5 GPA preferred" verbatim; leaving GPA off reads as hiding it.
Diversity and SEO badges
JPM-specific signals (Launching Leaders, Advancing Black Pathways, etc.) belong in a dedicated line under Education if applicable.
Bullet quantification
Every bullet should end in $, %, multiple, or basis-point delta. JPM's parser flags verb-only bullets ("Helped with...") as content-light.
1. Upload your resume
Drop the PDF you would submit to JPMorgan. 10MB max, text-based PDF only (Workday cannot parse images).
2. Paste the JPMorgan JD
Either the full JD text or the URL of the posting on jpmorganchase.com / LinkedIn. The score is tailored to that exact JD.
3. Review the line-by-line edits
Critical, notable, and polish edits are grouped by severity. Each shows the original bullet, the rewrite, and why the rewrite is stronger.
4. Download your improved PDF
Click Apply on the rewrites you want. The right-side preview rebuilds the PDF live as you accept edits, ready to submit.
NOT APPLYING YET?
New ATS keyword drops for each JPMorgan JD, deadline changes, and the specific resume mistakes that get cut in the first pass.
JPM does not require cover letters for most analyst applications and the recruiters do not read them in the first pass. Spend the time on the resume and the application form responses instead.
JPM uses preference ranking, and the algorithm reportedly weights your second and third choices similarly to your first. Ranking M&A first and a sector group (TMT, healthcare, FIG, consumer) second is the safest pattern.
No. Application data is firm-internal. Recruiters do not cross-reference applications between firms.
JPM runs applications through Workday for most regions and roles. The widget formats your resume to be Workday-clean, which also parses cleanly in Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS.
Recent JPM JDs flag "minimum 3.5 GPA preferred" verbatim. Leaving GPA off reads as hiding it and gets weighted more harshly than a 3.4 would. Keep it visible.
Same Workday parser, same modeling vocabulary, slightly different sector coverage signal. JPM JDs more often name "trading comps" and "precedent transactions" by keyword; Goldman JDs more often emphasize "deal execution" and "process management."
We keep the parsed text long enough to send you the report. The PDF itself is processed in memory and not retained.
Paste the summer JD specifically. The widget tunes the keyword match and the bullet conventions differently for summer analyst JDs (less emphasis on closed deals, more on coursework and project-based experience).